Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the


Re: One Would Think...
Posted by  BrendaTx of TX on 5/4/07 12:57pm Msg #188808
Dennis, When I began doing this business whenever I ran into a document I didn't know how to handle I have done it both ways, as long as I was able to make a duplicate to take with me.

The reason I started doing this is because I found that the signing service personnel often didn't have a clue and I didn't want to be left with title going all crazy on them or on me so I just started doing it both ways if there was a question. A stitch in time saves nine.

I know that many vet NSAs may say, "only sign where their name is" but the unfortunate thing about Texas is that there are around 30-40 pages of "junk docs" and often the title company just sends the forms and expects the notary to fill in the blanks correctly and get them signed correctly. During refi boom days it was quite common for title to let the notary fill in all the blanks and figure out pretty most all of it.

That left a lot for me to gamble on when I was getting my feet wet so I would go ahead and make a copy and get it done both ways.

Until you have a few signings behind you and know the difference between the legals, the lender docs and the title docs it is pretty overwhelming for Texans to figure it all out. I studied those documents a lot when I was beginning to find out which one told what story in case the borrower was looking for info.
PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message


Messages in this Thread
 new 1003 - Mary Irene Mccomb on 5/3/07 7:28pm
 Re: new 1003 -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 8:11pm
 Re: new 1003 - Lisa -  Sylvia_FL on 5/3/07 10:27pm
 Re: new 1003 - Lisa -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:10pm
 Re: new 1003 - Lisa -  LynnNC on 5/4/07 8:10am
 Where? - JanetLA on 5/3/07 9:01pm
 No, it really isn't open to interpretation -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 9:52pm
 Re: No, it really isn't open to interpretation - GF_CA on 5/3/07 10:24pm
 Re: No, it really isn't open to interpretation - pan/nd on 5/3/07 10:25pm
 Yes, it could (and should) be more simply put... -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:03pm
 Re: Yes, it could (and should) be more simply put... - pan/nd on 5/3/07 11:15pm
 From one mouse to another, I couldn't agree more -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:27pm
 YES it really IS open to interpretation - JanetLA on 5/4/07 8:28am
 Agree, JanetLA. I have single BOs put 'N/A' to show (s)he -  Susan Fischer on 5/5/07 10:59pm
 Re: new 1003 -  Joe Ewing on 5/3/07 10:48pm
 Re: new 1003 -  Joan Bergstrom on 5/3/07 11:12pm
 Maybe this will explain it... -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/3/07 11:24pm
 Re: Maybe this will explain it... - pan/nd on 5/3/07 11:37pm
 PAW has convinced me that the intent of the regulatory.... - Bob_Chicago on 5/4/07 1:15am
 Think who we are and what we do -  Ndwa on 5/4/07 2:41am
 Re: Think who we are and what we do -  Lisa Prestegard on 5/4/07 6:39am
 Crazy as it seems -  BrendaTx on 5/4/07 7:20am
 Re: Crazy as it seems - LauriecPA on 5/4/07 8:20am
 I do both ways... - Lee/AR on 5/4/07 8:30am
 One Would Think... -  Dennis D Broadbooks on 5/4/07 8:43am
 Re: One Would Think... - JanetLA on 5/4/07 8:56am
 Why Not? - Brad/AZ on 5/4/07 9:47am
 Re: One Would Think... -  BrendaTx on 5/4/07 12:57pm
 Re: new 1003 - Elizabeth Soliday on 5/4/07 12:40pm



 
Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
 
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2024, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.