Join  |  Login  |   Cart    

Notary Rotary
Just PoliticsLeisure
Welcome to the Notary Talk General Discussion Forum. Before posting, please read the


Re: Question About the New Required Florida ACK and Jurat
Posted by  VT_Syrup of VT on 1/22/20 7:49pm Msg #614869
View from an outsider:

I believe several states that allow RON require that notarizations done this way state in the certificate that the signer appeared using audio-video technology, or words to that effect. Apparently, Florida has taken the view that it isn't enough to ASSume the person was in the physical presence of the notary unless otherwise stated, every certificate must specify which of the two possible ways to appear occurred, (1) physical presence, or (2) online.

I believe there is one state that has passed a law indicating it is illegal for an out-of-state notary to perform a notarization if the signer is physically in the state that passed the law at the moment of the notarial act. And other recent threads have discussed getting such a law passed in CA in the future. Such laws would be easier to enforce of the certificate indicates whether the notarization was through audio-video appearance or not.

In addition, some document recipients may choose to reject RON, so having the certificate state which method of appearance was used will be helpful to these recipients.
PrevNextReturn to General Discussion    Post a Public Reply to this MessageSend Author a Private Message


Messages in this Thread
 Question About the New Required Florida ACK and Jurat -  JerryhFL on 1/22/20 6:03pm
 Re: Question About the New Required Florida ACK and Jurat - Walt Ashley on 1/22/20 6:36pm
 Re: Question About the New Required Florida ACK and Jurat -  VT_Syrup on 1/22/20 7:49pm
 RON a no go in Massachusetts .... - BobbiCT on 1/23/20 6:20am
 Re: RON a no go in Massachusetts .... -  Cheryl Elliott on 1/26/20 11:25am
 Re: Question About the New Required Florida ACK and Jurat - Luckydog on 1/22/20 8:11pm
 Re: Question About the New Required Florida ACK and Jurat -  VT_Syrup on 1/22/20 8:15pm
 Re: Question About the New Required Florida ACK and Jurat - Luckydog on 1/22/20 8:35pm
 Re: Question About the New Required Florida ACK and Jurat -  VT_Syrup on 1/22/20 9:38pm
 The words “before me” are no longer sufficient - FlaNotary2 on 1/23/20 4:14am
 Re: The words “before me” are no longer sufficient -  VT_Syrup on 1/23/20 7:34am
 Exactly - you're right, VT - Linda_H/FL on 1/23/20 8:32am
 Re: Exactly - you - Luckydog on 1/25/20 11:51am
 F.S. 117.05 - statutory wording - Linda_H/FL on 1/25/20 6:01pm
 Easy fix but requires extra writing if you don't want to - Linda_H/FL on 1/22/20 8:21pm
 Re: Question About the New Required Florida ACK and Jurat -  JerryhFL on 1/23/20 8:07am



 
Find a Notary   Notary Supplies   Terms   Privacy Statement   Help/FAQ   About   Contact Us   Archive  
 
Notary Rotary™ is a trademark of Notary Rotary. Copyright © 2002-2024, Notary Rotary, Inc.  All rights reserved.
500 New York Ave, Des Moines, IA 50313.